B. Elizabeth Delasobera, Tress L. Goodwin, Matthew Strehlow, Gregory Gilbert, Peter D'Souza, Amit Alok, Pallavi Raje, S.V. Mahadevan
"Objective Data on the efficacy of the simulation and multimedia teaching modalities is limited, particularly in developing nations. This study evaluates the effectiveness of simulator and multimedia educational tools in India.
Methods Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) certified paramedic students in India were randomized to either Simulation, Multimedia, or Reading for a 3-h ACLS refresher course. Simulation students received a lecture and 10 simulator cases. The Multimedia group viewed the American Heart Association (AHA) ACLS video and played a computer game. The Reading group independently read with an instructor present. Students were tested prior to (pre-test), immediately after (post-test), and 3 weeks after (short-term retention test), their intervention. During each testing stage subjects completed a cognitive, multiple-choice test and two cardiac arrest scenarios. Changes in exam performance were analyzed for significance. A survey was conducted asking students’ perceptions of their assigned modality.
Results One hundred and seventeen students were randomized to Simulation (n = 39), Multimedia (n = 38), and Reading (n = 40). Simulation demonstrated greater improvement managing cardiac arrest scenarios compared to both Multimedia and Reading on the post-test (9% versus 5% and 2%, respectively, p < 0.05) and Reading on the short-term retention test (6% versus −1%, p < 0.05). Multimedia showed significant improvement on cognitive, short-term retention testing compared to Simulation and Reading (5% versus 0% and 0%, respectively, p < 0.05). On the survey, 95% of Simulation and 84% of Multimedia indicated they enjoyed their modality.
Conclusion Simulation and multimedia educational tools were effective and may provide significant additive benefit compared to reading alone. Indian students enjoyed learning via these modalities."